gcformeornot
12-17 05:47 PM
on which PERM was filed. Audit does not alter that.
wallpaper robert pattinson and kristen
Macaca
08-05 08:12 AM
A Bad Deal Gets Worse (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/opinion/05sun2.html) August 5, 2007
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
omsakthi
02-12 08:35 PM
Dear Attorneys, Some one could you please reply.
THanks,
omsakthi.
THanks,
omsakthi.
2011 robert pattinson and kristen
nirmal301
03-23 12:12 AM
G'day Mates & Buddies,
Thanks for maintaining excellent site and answering all sorts of different complex questions.
Now my story.
I am going to apply in next H1B quota and was having below queries:
1. I am confuse about what kind of h1b interview questions will be ask by consulate officer
2. Will they ask my previous work experience letter.. because currently I am in Australia and my work experience was in India and there's no way I can have letter now.
3. How's the job market for Enterprise Oracle DBA
4. And Do I need to keep any extra precautions from start in order to be safe from all future legal problems being a consultant.
Thanks in advance for viewing and replying.
Cheers,
Nirmal
Go Desi's Go ;)
Thanks for maintaining excellent site and answering all sorts of different complex questions.
Now my story.
I am going to apply in next H1B quota and was having below queries:
1. I am confuse about what kind of h1b interview questions will be ask by consulate officer
2. Will they ask my previous work experience letter.. because currently I am in Australia and my work experience was in India and there's no way I can have letter now.
3. How's the job market for Enterprise Oracle DBA
4. And Do I need to keep any extra precautions from start in order to be safe from all future legal problems being a consultant.
Thanks in advance for viewing and replying.
Cheers,
Nirmal
Go Desi's Go ;)
more...
kernel_flash
01-21 05:50 AM
I bet I didn't want to miss this one !
Thanks Kirupa.
Thanks Kirupa.
gsc999
06-21 02:55 PM
When is it safe to change employment once you file for I-485?
thanks!
--
Nitu,
Please see this existing thread below for answer to your question:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5451
The norm is to search the existing threads on IV forum for answer to your questions. Opening new thread with redundant queries tends to dilute other more important issues being discussed.
In future, kindly search the forum before you start a new thread.
Thanks in advance.
thanks!
--
Nitu,
Please see this existing thread below for answer to your question:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5451
The norm is to search the existing threads on IV forum for answer to your questions. Opening new thread with redundant queries tends to dilute other more important issues being discussed.
In future, kindly search the forum before you start a new thread.
Thanks in advance.
more...
averagedesi
06-22 02:45 PM
Gang
Here is my situation, my PD is March 05 and my 140 is pending for the past 3 months. Do you guys think if I get my 140 approved by Premium processing it would increase my chances of 485 approval this fiscal year? BTW, as its obvious from my PD I will be filing my 485 in July, God willing.
Thanks
Here is my situation, my PD is March 05 and my 140 is pending for the past 3 months. Do you guys think if I get my 140 approved by Premium processing it would increase my chances of 485 approval this fiscal year? BTW, as its obvious from my PD I will be filing my 485 in July, God willing.
Thanks
2010 kristen stewart twilight
royus77
07-06 06:32 PM
My LD 01/31/2003 I485 date 10/20/03 extending my EAD 4th time. Stuck in backlog center TX. Any one recently got from TX backlog?
You are extending your 4 th EAD and here we are fighting for the first EADeven our days are current ( of course changed them back) ....Be happy with where you are and contribute ..please dont start a new thread unless its a uniique issue
You are extending your 4 th EAD and here we are fighting for the first EADeven our days are current ( of course changed them back) ....Be happy with where you are and contribute ..please dont start a new thread unless its a uniique issue
more...
gclongwaytogo
10-12 04:40 PM
why they cant? can you please let us know.
hair kristen stewart twilight
Blog Feeds
02-25 07:20 PM
Senators Richard Lugar (R-IN) and John Kerry (D-MA) have introduced the StartUp Visa Act of 2010. According to Senator Lugar's office: Senators John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, today introduced legislation to drive job creation and increase America�s global competiveness by helping immigrant entrepreneurs secure visas to the United States. The StartUp Visa Act of 2010 will allow an immigrant entrepreneur to receive a two year visa if he or she can show that a qualified U.S. investor is willing to dedicate a significant sum � a minimum...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/bipartisan-investor-visa-bill-introduced.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/bipartisan-investor-visa-bill-introduced.html)
more...
admin
03-27 03:56 PM
**Bump**
All the action is happening in this thread. Only members can access it. http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=392
All the action is happening in this thread. Only members can access it. http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=392
hot Kristen Stewart (plus
augustus
06-15 08:43 AM
My husband and I are in a big Dilemma whether to apply for EAD or AP? In the lawyer's note,it says that anyone who is I-140 Beneficiary will not be able to use EAD and AP. Is it true?
We are on our 3 years H1/H4 using I-140 benefits only. What should we do?
Please guide us.
We still have 3 years remaining. Problem - We both have no visa stamping after we got our extentions which why AP is required at this point?
Are there any travel restrictions after we file I-1485 with AP or WITHOUT AP.
Please highlight. Will be very useful for us.
Thank you sooo much
We are on our 3 years H1/H4 using I-140 benefits only. What should we do?
Please guide us.
We still have 3 years remaining. Problem - We both have no visa stamping after we got our extentions which why AP is required at this point?
Are there any travel restrictions after we file I-1485 with AP or WITHOUT AP.
Please highlight. Will be very useful for us.
Thank you sooo much
more...
house girlfriend Robert Pattinson
Ramba
05-15 03:47 PM
Thanks for polling. If more people vote, we can analyze how the impact of june visa bullition. Also, we can probabaly estimate how the july and aug visa bulliton will be.
tattoo See Photos of Robert Pattinson
BMWX5
04-19 07:57 AM
I saw a thread this morning about how to open a company when 485 pending, but I couldn't find it now. Anyone can help? great appreciate!
Do google with as many as keywords from that thread followed by immigration voice, you'll definitely get as long as that thread is still open.
Thats how I do.
Do google with as many as keywords from that thread followed by immigration voice, you'll definitely get as long as that thread is still open.
Thats how I do.
more...
pictures Kristen Stewart and Robert
hopefulgc
07-18 12:55 PM
What is the point of publishing dates for people to see if they have no relevance?
If they are just for CIS employees to see... why publish them publicly and confuse the deuce out of the entire immigrant community?
If they are "a statement of goals", why aren't these goals being adhered to?
Why set and publish goals that are are not followed?
If they are just for CIS employees to see... why publish them publicly and confuse the deuce out of the entire immigrant community?
If they are "a statement of goals", why aren't these goals being adhered to?
Why set and publish goals that are are not followed?
dresses hottie Robert Pattinson.
solaris27
12-04 06:06 PM
if your oldh1b expired then yer otherwise not .
more...
makeup Kristen Stewart Celebrities
kevinkris
07-14 05:21 PM
Any answers?
girlfriend Tags: kristen stewart, robert
puriyu
09-15 10:47 AM
http://imminfo.com/library/calculatingvisabulletinmovementarticle.html
hairstyles Robert Pattinson, Kristen
sara
10-23 01:20 PM
Hi All,
There is mismatch in Firstname and Last name in I-485 Application for spouse, Does any one know how to solve this problem?
Regards
Sara
There is mismatch in Firstname and Last name in I-485 Application for spouse, Does any one know how to solve this problem?
Regards
Sara
desigirl
04-28 10:49 AM
anything from the conference call that would benefit us?
I did not know about the conference call, where do you get such information?
I did not know about the conference call, where do you get such information?
plakshmi
09-24 10:07 AM
I filed my 485 in August 2008 with new fee structure (one time fee for AP and EAD renewals). Now my AP is expiring in November 2009. Can any one who applied for AP renewal under the one time fee structure let me know how do I make use of that fee. I mean.. Can i just skip sending the check for $305?
![big sean album download. [Album Leak] Big Sean](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uW6av8Cz2boxPFboHYpDRsJK51TB-g-1l4bD4yWe_0xTkM8DBUvHKzujVDl_XfO9v4i6Cq-vzNKgh6KPsgvSMwFZfIGSTtklh1K3BtB60SEtQ6HT93Tu4Rz8dOEabXXO0IOSKmLhlMVzUwDPDdlhdyCgv3EJHAZI4giScyhXWGYA=s0-d "[Album Leak] Big Sean")
![big sean album download. [Album Download] Big Sean](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-YVx69q7euMg/TfeBcpo2g5I/AAAAAAAAA-g/rnx0PD7aBHg/s1600/finally.famous%252Bfront%252Bcover.jpg "[Album Download] Big Sean")
