nixstor
03-06 03:50 PM
There are some companies that offer 100/0. Why not join them? :)
wallpaper Robert Pattinson and Kristen
uimv
02-21 02:27 PM
Hello,
After initially filing I-485, I got FP appointment for photo, signature and 10 fingerprints.
Will I get another FP appointment notice ? When is it likely ?
How many times do you get fingerprinted for one I-485 application ?
Is there a validity date for FP ?
Thank You.
After initially filing I-485, I got FP appointment for photo, signature and 10 fingerprints.
Will I get another FP appointment notice ? When is it likely ?
How many times do you get fingerprinted for one I-485 application ?
Is there a validity date for FP ?
Thank You.
Blog Feeds
04-30 01:50 AM
USCIS statistics reveal that only 1,000 H-1B "cap-subject" petitions were submitted each week during the second, third and fourth weeks of April. See http://shusterman.com/toc-h1b.html#1 At this rate, there will be H-1Bs available until sometime in September. However, I do not believe that this will be the case. Why not? Because, there are hundreds of thousands of F-1 students in the U.S. Many of these students will graduate from U.S. universities this June, and seek to work in the U.S. Regarding employment in the U.S., these students should consider the following: 1. They may apply for Optional Practical Training (OPT). This...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/04/h-1b-advice-for-students-and-their-employers.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/04/h-1b-advice-for-students-and-their-employers.html)
2011 Twilight wedding gown.
cs007
10-31 12:28 AM
Hi, I am in 8th year of H1b with 140 approved (EB3) from company A. I would like to switch to company B and planning to start EB2 quickly to enage a new interesting project . I have following questions related to the same and early advice from you all would be highly appreciated as am running out of time in engaging the new project.
1. Can I do H1 transfer from company A to company B using A's 140 approval after my 6 years of original h1b quota. I am currently on 8th year of h1b.
2. Can I able to port the priority date from company A's EB3 filing with the new EB2 filing from company B?
3. If company A cancels the 140, still can I able to port the PD ?
thanks.
CS
1. Can I do H1 transfer from company A to company B using A's 140 approval after my 6 years of original h1b quota. I am currently on 8th year of h1b.
2. Can I able to port the priority date from company A's EB3 filing with the new EB2 filing from company B?
3. If company A cancels the 140, still can I able to port the PD ?
thanks.
CS
more...
eb3_nepa
09-14 10:07 PM
Hi,
I see a LOT of the same questions being posted over and over again. (eg. H1b Transfer, Eb3 to Eb2 etc). I also see that the Questions answered by the lawyer are quite hard to access and the info about the next call etc is also quite hard to get to.
How about we bring the 2 worlds together. We have a Menu Item on the Left saying either "FAQ's about immigration" or "Q/A from lawyers" etc. and somewhere on the homepage plus in the forums section we put some text saying "Before posting please check out the answers from lawyers" and put a link to the same.
Along with that (if possible), we also put all the questions and how many have been answered and which ones are going to be answered.
I see a LOT of the same questions being posted over and over again. (eg. H1b Transfer, Eb3 to Eb2 etc). I also see that the Questions answered by the lawyer are quite hard to access and the info about the next call etc is also quite hard to get to.
How about we bring the 2 worlds together. We have a Menu Item on the Left saying either "FAQ's about immigration" or "Q/A from lawyers" etc. and somewhere on the homepage plus in the forums section we put some text saying "Before posting please check out the answers from lawyers" and put a link to the same.
Along with that (if possible), we also put all the questions and how many have been answered and which ones are going to be answered.
YesWeWillGet
03-20 09:42 PM
Hi,
1. I am planning to work with a new employer on EAD. As i have heard in order to file AC21 the employer letter should present same job description as previous. I would like to know what are the other things we need to consider in order to be safe while filing AC21.
2. I requested my current employer to provide the copy of Labor certification that was filed for me. I received the following response from XYZ Company Inc., DOES NOT RELEASE COPIES OF THE LC, AS IT IS OUR APPLICATION WITH THE DOL FOR A POSITION NOT AN EMPLOYEE AND IT IS CONSIDERED PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.
How should I have to obtain the Job Code etc.,?
Thank you
1. I am planning to work with a new employer on EAD. As i have heard in order to file AC21 the employer letter should present same job description as previous. I would like to know what are the other things we need to consider in order to be safe while filing AC21.
2. I requested my current employer to provide the copy of Labor certification that was filed for me. I received the following response from XYZ Company Inc., DOES NOT RELEASE COPIES OF THE LC, AS IT IS OUR APPLICATION WITH THE DOL FOR A POSITION NOT AN EMPLOYEE AND IT IS CONSIDERED PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.
How should I have to obtain the Job Code etc.,?
Thank you
more...
kaisersose
04-19 11:49 AM
I moved recently with a pending 485 from NSC jurisdiction to TX as I see no problems.
2010 Kristen Stewart as Bella Swan
drona
09-01 04:19 PM
IV Meet-up in San Diego Sept 2nd at 1 PM. Please join our yahoo group for more info:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SC_Immigration_Voice/
See you then!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SC_Immigration_Voice/
See you then!
more...
sln2001
09-25 10:07 PM
Recently i have joined a new employer after my H1 transfer has been applied, today i have recieved approval notice and its approved until October 15 2007,
were has my previous h1 was valid until October 2008. Please help how should i proceed ?
Please provide more information:
Was this transfer for a 7th year extension ?
Was it based on existing I140/pending labor application?
were has my previous h1 was valid until October 2008. Please help how should i proceed ?
Please provide more information:
Was this transfer for a 7th year extension ?
Was it based on existing I140/pending labor application?
hair Breaking Dawn: Bella#39;s Wedding
gcmaker
04-01 10:21 AM
I think there was a change in the rules for re-entry permits - you have to submit for biometrics before you leave the U.S. - so the auntie may not be able to apply for re-entry permit if she is outside the U.S.
http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/03/new-biometric-requirements-for-re-entry-permits/
http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/03/new-biometric-requirements-for-re-entry-permits/
more...
Comiccmadd
07-19 04:46 PM
really clever and funny design!! u should definitely print it :):)
hot Bella Swan#39;s Wedding Gown
rajeshalex
08-15 06:26 AM
Hi All,
I have I-140 with PD of 2004 from previous company. From the current company I had started new GC process.
a) Previous labor title is software engineer. New labor title is Computer support specialist.
b) New perm process just started and job order has been posted last month.
In the job order company didnt give much details and only one sentence which is related to the old labor job description though it has 8 lines describing the job description
c)Should the above be a problem for porting the PD? Also current company has not done the sunday ads. Can they include all 8 lines describing the job description in the sunday ads?
d)I am in Viriginia and which sunday news papers do you recommend(EB2)
category.
e) Is there any PERM filing fee ?
Thank you
Rajesh
:confused:
I have I-140 with PD of 2004 from previous company. From the current company I had started new GC process.
a) Previous labor title is software engineer. New labor title is Computer support specialist.
b) New perm process just started and job order has been posted last month.
In the job order company didnt give much details and only one sentence which is related to the old labor job description though it has 8 lines describing the job description
c)Should the above be a problem for porting the PD? Also current company has not done the sunday ads. Can they include all 8 lines describing the job description in the sunday ads?
d)I am in Viriginia and which sunday news papers do you recommend(EB2)
category.
e) Is there any PERM filing fee ?
Thank you
Rajesh
:confused:
more...
house Bella Swan#39;s wedding dress
thomasstuart
11-22 06:10 AM
Hi there,
I haven't got any ideas, but I was wondering if you ever got a solution
as I would like to do the same thing. Cheers!
I haven't got any ideas, but I was wondering if you ever got a solution
as I would like to do the same thing. Cheers!
tattoo Bella (Kristen Stewart) is set
srinivasj
07-07 12:11 PM
I took the HDFC receipt prior to June 28th..and I am planning to go for interview in August..should I take a new HDFC receipt for the difference..?
more...
pictures Kristen Stewart#39;s wedding
Macaca
07-31 05:23 PM
It's Time to End Or Reduce The Cloture Clog (http://rollcall.com/issues/53_15/guest/19599-1.html) By Robert Weiner and John Larmett, July 31 2007
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
dresses Check out Rob amp; Kristen#39;s
vicks_don
09-20 01:56 PM
Your PD is not Current also there is no premium processing for EB2 yet. You can file I140 through your Lawyer.
more...
makeup Kristen Stewart) gets married
admin
03-27 03:56 PM
**Bump**
All the action is happening in this thread. Only members can access it. http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=392
All the action is happening in this thread. Only members can access it. http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=392
girlfriend Check out pics of Kristen#39;s
PirahnaTM
03-23 02:17 AM
Let's play!
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/4597/justdrawyourselfpira.png
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/4597/justdrawyourselfpira.png
hairstyles kristen-stewart-zac-posen-
eastindia
04-19 09:47 AM
https://www.csctapes.com/tapes/aila.htm
The seminar recordings are available here for download. Can any of our friendly lawyers give us? or upload for us?
We want to know what USCIS officials spoke in the conference. Why is such useful information hidden from public and people have to pay $495. Why is all information paid? Such information can help all of us know what USCIS plans to help us.
The seminar recordings are available here for download. Can any of our friendly lawyers give us? or upload for us?
We want to know what USCIS officials spoke in the conference. Why is such useful information hidden from public and people have to pay $495. Why is all information paid? Such information can help all of us know what USCIS plans to help us.
smartboy75
08-26 11:03 PM
I know ...it sucks ....I have already created a thread for that ...check it out...
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=21141
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=21141
Dirge
03-21 02:28 AM
This is another one of me for the contest. I wanted on with a more accurate portrayal of myself. I may have exaggerated the muscles a bit, but I'm mos'def in shape.
anyway I'm learning to code, it's going pretty terrible haha.
http://fc73.deviantart.com/fs42/f/2009/079/b/9/2nd_portrait_by_MelonCat.png
anyway I'm learning to code, it's going pretty terrible haha.
http://fc73.deviantart.com/fs42/f/2009/079/b/9/2nd_portrait_by_MelonCat.png
No comments:
Post a Comment